Welcome to the Nourish Clinical Insights Blog, a resource for clinicians. With help from our key contributor, Dr. Mark DeLegge, we will be posting abstracts of relevant medical articles as well as other home nutrition content, and we look forward to your input. As an industry leader in home nutrition support, we strive continuously to enhance patient care and professional growth by advancing the knowledge, skills and understanding of TPN and tube feeding therapies. Our goal is that this blog will help further these efforts and be a forum for ideas about nutrition support. We hope you enjoy it and we encourage you to participate!

 

Jan 21, 2012

Study Evaluates 203 Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) Patients


Klek S, Szybinski P, Sierzega M, et al. Commercial enteral formulas and nutrition support teams improve the outcome of home enteral tube feeding. JPEN. 2011;3:380-385. (The authors are from Krakow, Poland. Some of the authors are employed by Nutrimed Medical Corporation.)


This was an interesting study evaluating 203 home enteral nutrition (HEN) patients. To start, the patients were fed homemade diets (pureed table foods) for tube feeding for 12 months, with oversight by the family only. Following use of the homemade diets, the patients used commercial enteral tube feeding (ETF) for 12 months, with the guidance of a nutritional support team (NST). When the patients used the ETF with the guidance of an NST, as compared to when they used a homemade tube feeding with no NST, they had significantly reduced hospital admissions (0.21/year [p<.001] vs. 1.2/year), duration of hospitalizations (3.83 days [p<.001] versus 20.84 days), and duration of ICU stay (0.50 days [p<.001] versus 2.35 days). Also, the cost of hospitalization was significantly reduced in the commercial ETF group that was followed by an NST. In addition, the incidence of pneumonia, respiratory failure, urinary tract infection, and anemia were significantly reduced in the commercial ETF/NST oversight group (p<.05).

This study used the same patients for their own controls, thus creating a very good comparison study. Often when evaluating the use of a medical product, we look at the cost of the intervention only. In this case, the use of commercial tube feeding and NST guidance was most likely more costly initially than pureed table foods and oversight only by the family. However, the use of commercial ETF and NST guidance led to significantly improved clinical outcomes and a significant reduction in the cost of hospitalization. This study shows that tube feeding at home is not an intervention that should be viewed as “secondary” to the other therapies the patient may be receiving. Proper use of HEN can significantly impact patient clinical outcomes.

2 comments:

  1. I am happy to find your distinguished way of writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to
    understand and implement the concept. Thank you for the post.

    Clinical Nutrition

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So glad to hear that you find this information useful!

      Delete

Please note that comments posted on this blog are reviewed prior to publication.